The Aerospace Agenda
A blog about all things aviation and space related
The Aerospace Agenda

Time Lapse Photos Show Beauty of Davis-Monthan Aircraft Boneyard

If you want to see a creative take on one of the most famous repositories of old aircraft, check out this new new video of former warbirds stored at David-Monthan Air Force Base in Tucson, AZ. Using time-lapse photos taken throughout the boneyard, it shows haunting views of some classic aircraft stored in the dry desert landscape. Especially beautiful are some of the photos taken at night under the clear, star-filled Arizona skies. In some of the photos, colored lights are placed inside ... << MORE >>

The Passing of a Real American Hero: Neil Armstrong

I was filled with shock and sadness yesterday when I heard of the passing of Neil Armstrong, the first human to walk on the moon on July 20, 1969. Shock, because I hadn't heard of any recent health issues with Armstrong, and sadness for the passing of a real American hero who inspired me to pursue a career in aerospace. While still undecided where to study aerospace engineering in the mid-70's, I read a book about the Apollo ... << MORE >>

Sucess of NASA's Curiosity Landing Could Inspire a New Generation of Aerospace Engineers

With the successful landing of NASA's Curiosity rover on Mars earlier today, a new generation of young people could be inspired to become aerospace (or mechanical, electrical, etc.) engineers. The immensely complicated mission culminated in a risky, but spectacular soft landing on the surface of mars. Even with the London 2012 Olympics capturing much of the media's attention, Curiosity viewing parties around the world tuned into live feeds from mission control ... << MORE >>

Aerospace Engineering On High-Pay/Low-Stress Job List

There is some good news recently for aerospace engineers. Not only is the job market looking better, but a recent article lists aerospace engineering as one of the top 5 high-paying, low-stress jobs. A recent article by payscale.com shows aeronautical engineering (OK, that sounds a little antiquated, since most degrees these days are for aerospace, but we get the idea) number four on the list of jobs that ... << MORE >>

Space Tourism – So Close, Yet So Far Away

A recent article in the New York Times mentions that 2012 could be the year we see the start of limited space tourism via suborbital flights by Virgin Galactic. I'm sure the media coverage (TV, web, magazines) will intensify throughout the year as we get closer to first launch, possibly by the end of the year. Other companies such as Blue OriginSpaceX, and XCOR have discussed the possibility of launching  tourists ... << MORE >>

Debate About Electronic Gadget Use in Airliners Rages On

The debate about using electronic gadgets on airliner cabins seems to be never-ending, and was high-lighted again with the recent Alec Baldwin incident on an American Airlines flight. I addressed a similar issue with this blog post about Europe allowing cell phones. In the almost four years since I wrote that post, very little has changed among the airlines and certification agencies (FAA, etc.) when ... << MORE >>

External Video Camera Helps Qantas Pilots Assess Airbus A380 Damage

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) released their preliminary report on the Qantas Airbus 380 engine failure that occurred on November 4, 2010, and it includes some interesting findings. The report details the extensive damage caused by the uncontained engine failure of the Rolls-Royce Trent engine and the remarkable effort of the aircrew to land the plane safely. (An uncontained engine failure is when a major part of the turbofan engine, such as a compressor disc, fails and pieces exit the engine ... << MORE >>

Terrafugia Roadable Aircraft Gets Weight Break from FAA, But Still Far From Production

The Terrafugia Transition roadable aircraft that I have blogged about before is in the news again. A recent press release from the company states that the FAA has upped the maximum gross weight (plane, fuel, passengers, baggage) limit of the Transition by 110 pounds, for a total of 1430 pounds at takeoff. The Terrafugia team is attempting to certify the Transition in the Light Sport Aircraft category to reduce certification costs and complexity. The FAA made the exception for the Transition due to the fact that it is designed to be driven on roads like a car after landing at an airport. The additional weight will allow the Transition to include typical car safety features such as airbags.

While this is encouraging news for the Transition, I believe the company still has a ways to go before they can deliver a production aircraft. After talking with a Terrafugia rep at Oshkosh last summer (see picture below of the Terrafugia display at Oshkosh), I am a little less optimistic than I originally was that the company can deliver an aircraft in the time frame they are currently quoting (4th quarter 2011), if at all. Although the prototype did fly successfully, from what I read, and saw in company videos, it never flew a complete circuit  around the airport during the flight test program. That would require a series of 90 degree turns, of which I have never seen any video. It appears that the test pilot only took off and flew straight ahead, landing further down the very long runway. To me this indicated they encountered stability and control issues with the prototype that would not be acceptable in a production aircraft.  The rep at Oshkosh said they had to go back to redesign parts of the aircraft to address stability issues, but nothing that couldn't be solved in the second design iteration. In the press release announcing the gross weight increase, Terrafugia says they will unveil "...computer graphics of the production prototype design.." at the big Airventure airshow in Oshkosh, WI later this month. But I'm thinking If they only have computer graphics to show at this time, the first flight of their second version must not be scheduled for any time soon. Add on the extensive flight test program that will be required to certify the production-ready Transition after first flight, and it looks like the end of 2011 to begin delivering production aircraft is very optimistic. I think the real problem is not as much technical as it is financial. I got the feeling from the Terrafugia rep that they need more money to get them through the certification process successfully. Having to build a whole new pre-production aircraft and test it certainly doesn't help with the cost situation. With the estimated cost of a production aircraft near $200K, they probably don't have enough deposits to keep them going until production.They claim to have 70 deposits of $10K each, for a total of $700K - in my opinion not nearly enough to get to production. I'm sure they are seeking other investors to help them out, but in these tough financial times, investors in high risk ventures are much harder to find. I'm still pulling for Terrafugia to be successful, but sometimes having the best, most innovative aircraft design does not always mean you will be successful. Luck and timing has a lot to do with it, and ufortunately Terrafugia is trying to make all this happen in one of the most difficult economies the world has seen in the past 50 years.



F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Formation Photos

A friend sent me these pictures last week of two Lockheed F-35s in formation flight:












Taken recently, as far as I know these are some of the first official photos of several F-35s in formation flight. These two aircraft are AF-1 and AF-2, the Air Force version of the F-35. AF-1 is the first to fly, and it looks like it has had the vertical stabilizers repainted with lightning bolts, obviously a reference to its nickname "Lightning II". The other version flying is the U.S. Marines F-35B VSTOL version currently undergoing flight test at Patuxent River, Maryland. The Navy version, F-35C, which will have a larger wing, stronger landing gear and tailhook for carrier operations, has not flown yet.

The F-35 has been receiving a fair amount of attention recently because it is one of the most expensive DOD programs, and has been flagged for schedule delays and cost increases. So far there have not been any big technical issues.

Lots of Bull With Record Skydive Attempt

I've noticed more and more coverage in recent months of another attempt to break the 50 year-old altitude "record" for skydiving, including this article in the New York Times science section. Sponsored by the energy-drink maker Red Bull, the Stratos project appears to be well-funded venture, with a team consisting of veterans from the aerospace industry including Joe Kittinger, who made the highest free-fall skydive of 102,800 feet back in 1960. (Though when Kittinger made his jump, he wasn't trying to break any records. He was doing it as part of pioneering aerospace research in the early days of the space program.) Like this other attempt to "out-jump" Kittinger that I previously blogged about, Red Bull is claiming that the Stratos project will provide valuable scientific data on bailout for future astronauts. After reading about this project, my BS meter was again fully pegged. I remain just as skeptical about the Red Bull science as justification for this project as I did for French sky diver Michael Fournier. The only difference is the Red Bull team is much better funded than Fournier. As I wrote previously, there really isn't much to be gained from these type of high altitude parachute jumps. In my experience working on high-performance escape systems, including participating in studies on escape systems for the hypersonic X-30 National Aerospace Plane and the Space Shuttle, manual bailout is not a viable option for escape from high performance aircraft and/or spacecraft. Emergencies happen so fast that you would never have time to manually bailout, especially if there were multiple crew onboard. You really need some type of automated, encapsulated escape system to protect crewmembers at extreme speeds and altitudes. The military and NASA already realize this, and that is why you don't see them doing anything remotely like this anymore. Even if you could justify this project on scientific grounds, risking a person's life would not be the way to do it. The latest scientific manikins (crash dummies) built today are so  sophisticated that they can provide much more physiological data than anything available when Kittinger made his jump. That's why you never see human testing of aircraft escape systems, or even less risky car crash testing, any more. I'm sure Stratos sky diver Felix Baumgartner is a very competent and courageous person, but let's not be fooled that he and his sponsors are doing it for the sake of science. Red Bull's marketing is all about adventure sports and breaking records, and to me, this looks like the ultimate marketing ploy to sell a whole sh--load of energy drink.